Print

 

 Volume. 8 Issue. 24 – July 3, 2024


This week the Tribunal considers whether to adjudicate an Applicant’s claim for in excess of $400K worth of benefits, as well as a claim for an Award. The non – CAT limits had been exhausted, and the Applicant had not sought a CAT determination, as it was less than two years since the subject MVA.




Application Premature On Benefits Claimed in Excess of Limits

No Jurisdiction Regarding $400K+ Worth of Benefits – Injured in a January 2023 MVA, the Applicant Alkhatlan submitted an OCF-6 to Aviva seeking reimbursement for $455,530.06 owed to Trillium Health Partners in November 2023. Two days after submission Aviva paid the remainder of the non-catastrophic policy limits for medical and rehabilitation benefits of $48,607.24. In 23-010231 v Aviva, Alkhatlan sought entitlement to the balance of the OCF-6 in addition to four OCF-18s as well as attendant care (ACB). Alkhatlan also sought an award for unreasonably withheld or delayed payments. The Tribunal ultimately found that the claims for substantive issues was premature, however could proceed with respect to the claim for an award.

Noting that Alkhatlan was not able to apply for a CAT determination until two years post MVA (January 2025), it was determined that “a hearing is not necessary to make any findings about her entitlement to the disputed benefits, nor interest.” However, Alkhatlan sought “an order that the application be heard on its merits… the Tribunal could rule on the reasonableness and necessity, while payment can be deferred subject to availability of policy limits or pending a catastrophic determination. The applicant submits that the concept of “reasonable and necessary” and “payable” are distinct.”

The Tribunal was not persuaded by this line of reasoning, agreeing with Aviva that the application for benefits was premature, noting that the Tribunal “has endorsed preconditions to entitlement, refusing to adjudicate entitlement to precondition-dependent benefits where the precondition has not been satisfied.” Reference was made to Tlapale v. Wawanesa Insurance, wherein in a similar fact situation, “that the fact that the applicant’s policy limit had been reached prefaces any other consideration in this matter”. In order to find entitlement to the benefits in dispute, Alkhatlan must be deemed CAT, and as that issue is not before the Tribunal, it cannot be found that the benefits are reasonable and necessary.



Further, “it is an abuse of process to adjudicate something that the applicant cannot possibly gain from”. Seeking adjudication of entitlement to benefits, where there cannot be entitlement subverts the principles enshrined in the SPPA and the Rules of proportionality, expediency and cost-efficiency. Using Alkhatlan’s approach, could result in an absurdity, with for example an applicant, not contesting that they were held within the MIG, seeking entitlement to hypothetical non MIG benefits. The “pursuit of her entitlement to benefits at this juncture would result in a waste of Tribunal resources and the resources of the parties.”

As for the claim for an award, the Tribunal noted that if the “hypothetical OCF-19 were accepted by the respondent and no further dispute regarding entitlement arose, or if she never files an OCF-19, then the applicant would be deprived of her opportunity to seek an award on any benefits that were unreasonably denied or withheld that form part of this dispute. Therefore, I find that the applicant may proceed to a hearing on the issue of an award only.”



Access inHEALTH’s research resources through Live Chat and receive your OAR. Get It now!

 

Archive of LAT Updates

October 30, 2024: Court Remits “Unsafe” Decision Back for Rehearing

CAT, Divisional Court

October 28, 2024: IE Fails to Explain Lack of Diagnosis

MIG

October 23, 2024: Loose Lid Unexpected "Accident"

Definition Accident

October 21, 2024: Dental Work Required Not Caused by MVA

MIG

October 7, 2024: Continuity of Complaints Confirm Chronic Pain

MIG

October 2, 2024: All Items in Dispute Deemed Incurred

Treatment Plans

September 30, 2024: Ignoring Medical Evidence Proves Award Worthy

MIG

September 25, 2024: Credibility Issues Abound with IE Assessor

IE

September 23, 2024: Reliance on Symptom Magnification Test Proves Fatal

MIG

September 16, 2024: Self Reporting Accepted for Psych MIG Escape

MIG

September 9, 2024: Diagnosis Alone Falls Short in Chronic Pain Case

MIG

September 4, 2024: CAT Finding Upheld on Reconsideration

CAT, Reconsiderations

August 28, 2024: Staged MVA Results in $93K Repayment Order

Definition Accident, Evidence

August 26, 2024: What Exactly Constitutes “Compelling” Evidence?

MIG

August 21, 2024: Extreme Impairment Confirmed in CAT Decision

CAT

August 19, 2024: Post Concussive Syndrome Diagnosed in Telephone Interview

MIG

August 14, 2024: Reconsideration Varies Decision Regarding “Accident”

Definition Accident, Divisional Court

August 12, 2024: Adverse Inference Considered in MIG Determination

MIG

August 7, 2024: Re-Training Not A Viable Option - Post 104 IRB Confirmed

IRB

July 31, 2024: Applicants Allowed to Proceed to Hearing Despite Alleged Non – Compliance

Insurer’s Examinations, Procedure

July 29, 2024: No Specific Reference to Evidence Precludes MIG Escape

MIG

July 24, 2024: When is a Spouse Not a “Spouse”?

Death Benefit

July 22, 2024: No Evidence Tendered to Rebut Concussion Diagnosis

MIG

July 17, 2024: 196K Grievance Award Factored into IRB Calculation

IRB

July 15, 2024: Chronic Pain Diagnosis Does Not Warrant MIG Escape

MIG

July 10, 2024: Court Allows Applicant to Submit Judicial Review After the Fact

Divisional Court

July 8, 2024: MIG Escape Despite Unrelated Psych Issues

MIG

July 3, 2024:Application Premature On Benefits Claimed in Excess of Limits

Award, CAT, Jurisdiction

June 26, 2024: Multiple Wilful Misrepresentations Claimed but Only One Established

IRB

June 24, 2024: Chronic Pain Diagnosis 4 Years Later Uncontroverted

MIG

June 19, 2024: Court Sets Aside Tribunal Decision and Makes Decision that Ought to Have Been Made

Definition Accident, Divisional Court

June 17, 2024: Cause of ‘Remote’ Finger Fracture Questioned

MIG

June 10, 2024: Reliability on IE Opinions Challenged

MIG

June 5, 2024: IE 'Highly Intrusive' - Not Acceptable Reason For Failure To Attend

Insurer's Examinations

June 3, 2024: MVA Necessary Cause of Subluxation of Shoulder Joint

MIG

May 29, 2024: Practicing Lawyer Seeks CAT Determination

CAT

May 27, 2024: Differing Opinions on Right Knee Injury Causation

MIG

May 22, 2024: Four Marked Impairments CAT and Post 104 IRB Confirmed

CAT, IRB

May 15, 2024: Court Confirms Three Breaches of Procedural Fairness by Tribunal

Div Court

May 13, 2024: Little Weight Given to Illegible Doctor's Notes

MIG

May 8, 2024: Reasonable Perception of Bias Involving Former Adjudicator Requires Rehearing

Reconsideration

May 6, 2024: Potential Causation Does Not Support MIG Escape

MIG

May 1, 2024: Tribunal Varies Three Decisions on Reconsideration

Reconsideration, Treatment Plans

April 29, 2024: Credibility of Assessment Favored Over Psych Validity Testing

MIG

April 24, 2024: Wilful Misrepresentation Abounds on IRB Repayments

IRB

April 22, 2024: Records Alone Do Not Warrant MIG Removal on Pre-Existing

MIG

April 15, 2024: Demands of Child-birth Pre-Existing Condition?

MIG

April 10, 2024: Court Upholds Tribunal Decision That a MIG Removal is a Complete MIG Removal

Divisional Court, MIG

April 8, 2024: Psychiatric Diagnosis Prevails over Psychological Opinion

MIG

April 3, 2024: Court Sends Matter Back to Tribunal Concerning “Accident”

Definition Accident, Divisional Court

April 1, 2024: Ortho Opinion Prevails on Origins of a Fracture

MIG

March 27, 2024: Supreme Court Takes Issue with Tribunal, Divisional Court & Court of Appeal

Limitation Period, Reconsideration, Supreme Court

March 25, 2024: Expert’s Conclusory Statement Insufficient on Pre-existing Condition

MIG

March 20, 2024: Non-Compliance by Both Parties Impacts IRB and Medical Claims

IRB

March 18, 2024: No Weight Afforded to Handwritten Illegible CNR’s

MIG

March 13, 2024: Denials Deficient and Pain Relief Validates Treatment Plans

Treatment Plans

March 11, 2024: “Radicular Irritation” & MRI Findings Not MVA Related

MIG

March 6, 2024: Tribunal Upholds Decision Excluding Improperly Secured IEs From the Evidence

Evidence, IE, Reconsideration

March 4, 2024: Concussion and Chronic Pain Diagnoses Require Expertise

MIG

February 28, 2024: Prior Health Concerns Complicate Claim for CAT

CAT

February 26, 2024: Unchallenged Virtual Chronic Pain Assessment Accepted

MIG

February 21, 2024: Consent by Parties for Adjournment Not Determinative

Adjournment, Procedure

February 14, 2024: Tribunal Does Not Accept the CAT Findings of Either Party

CAT

February 12, 2024: MIG Escape on Concussion Diagnosis Despite Resolution of Symptoms

MIG