Print
 

 Volume. 8 Issue. 21 – June 5, 2024


This week the Tribunal considers the reasons provided by the Applicant for not attending the scheduled Insurer’s Examinations (IE’s) and on what basis it would consider using the discretion afforded to it under s55(2) of the Schedule to permit the application to proceed.



SABS Summer Session!

Secure your seat for inHEALTH’s 2024 Summer Virtual Training session!

  • SABS Expedited: June 17th – 21st, 2024

*Eligible Participants receive 9 Substantive – CPD hours upon course completion

Course details & register here +



IE ‘Highly Intrusive’ – Not Acceptable Reason For Failure To Attend

Not Permitted to Proceed with CAT Dispute? – In 22-009483 v. Economical Insurance, the Applicant Jennifer Noble was involved in an automobile accident on August 12, 2019, and sought benefits, including determination that she was Catastrophically Impaired under criterion 7 and 8 along with several Treatment Plans. Economical arranged for an IE with Psychiatrist Dr. A. Liaqat on March 3, 2023. Noble having attended the office of IE became uncomfortable and after 90 minutes of examination requested a break to contact her counsel after which she left without completing the examination.

Economical learned approximately 10 days after the examination of March 3, 2023 that Dr. Liaqat was subject to professional disciplinary action. They attempted to reschedule another IE June 21, 2023, but Noble did not attend because she had already attended the IE on March 3, 2023 and a further examination was not reasonable or necessary due to the intrusive nature of the examination. The Tribunal noted ‘It is significant that the applicant’s counsel acknowledged in his correspondence that IE was not completed, characterizing it as “highly intrusive”. Economical rescheduled another IE for January 2024 and once again Noble refused to attend. Economical brought a Motion for an Order barring the Application from proceeding pursuant to s. 55(1)2 of the Schedule, because the Applicant failed to participate in an IE pursuant to s.44 of the Schedule.

The Tribunal found that Noble acknowledged that the IE was reasonably necessary because she attended the examination on March 3, 2023. Further that the circumstances preventing the completion of the IE did not negate Economical’ s entitlement to an IE if it was reasonably necessary, despite the inherently intrusive nature of IEs. Referring to the Tribunal decision in 19-004734 v. Aviva General Insurance Company, Economical was entitled to select its own examiner without interference from Noble, subject to reasonable efforts in respect of time, date and location, as long as the IE is reasonably necessary and in accordance with s. 44 of the Schedule.

Having found the IE of March 3, 2022 was not completed, and the burden of proof lies upon Noble to provide a reasonable explanation for not attending the examination, according to the Tribunal decision in 17-002921 v. Aviva Insurance Canada. “It is not necessary to make a finding of fault for the failure of the examination to be completed. If an insurer is found to have a reasonably necessary basis for an examination, the burden of proof lies upon the insured person to provide a reasonable explanation for not attending the examination”. Noble’s refusal to attend the second IE because it was too intrusive was not a reasonable explanation for non-attendance. The Tribunal jurisprudence has established that IEs are by their nature intrusive, but a necessary step to determine entitlement to accident benefits.

Noble was barred from proceeding with her Application for CAT determination and several Treatment Plans pursuant to s. 55(1)2 of the Schedule for failing to attend the rescheduled IE’s. The Tribunal could exercise its discretion under s.55(2) Schedule to permit Noble to proceed with her application despite not attending an IE. However, having found that Noble failed to provide a reasonable explanation for non-attendance and that she did not make any submissions as to the reasons why the Tribunal should exercise its discretion the application was dismissed.



Access inHEALTH’s research resources through Live Chat and receive your OAR. Get It now!

 

Archive of LAT Updates

October 30, 2024: Court Remits “Unsafe” Decision Back for Rehearing

CAT, Divisional Court

October 28, 2024: IE Fails to Explain Lack of Diagnosis

MIG

October 23, 2024: Loose Lid Unexpected "Accident"

Definition Accident

October 21, 2024: Dental Work Required Not Caused by MVA

MIG

October 7, 2024: Continuity of Complaints Confirm Chronic Pain

MIG

October 2, 2024: All Items in Dispute Deemed Incurred

Treatment Plans

September 30, 2024: Ignoring Medical Evidence Proves Award Worthy

MIG

September 25, 2024: Credibility Issues Abound with IE Assessor

IE

September 23, 2024: Reliance on Symptom Magnification Test Proves Fatal

MIG

September 16, 2024: Self Reporting Accepted for Psych MIG Escape

MIG

September 9, 2024: Diagnosis Alone Falls Short in Chronic Pain Case

MIG

September 4, 2024: CAT Finding Upheld on Reconsideration

CAT, Reconsiderations

August 28, 2024: Staged MVA Results in $93K Repayment Order

Definition Accident, Evidence

August 26, 2024: What Exactly Constitutes “Compelling” Evidence?

MIG

August 21, 2024: Extreme Impairment Confirmed in CAT Decision

CAT

August 19, 2024: Post Concussive Syndrome Diagnosed in Telephone Interview

MIG

August 14, 2024: Reconsideration Varies Decision Regarding “Accident”

Definition Accident, Divisional Court

August 12, 2024: Adverse Inference Considered in MIG Determination

MIG

August 7, 2024: Re-Training Not A Viable Option - Post 104 IRB Confirmed

IRB

July 31, 2024: Applicants Allowed to Proceed to Hearing Despite Alleged Non – Compliance

Insurer’s Examinations, Procedure

July 29, 2024: No Specific Reference to Evidence Precludes MIG Escape

MIG

July 24, 2024: When is a Spouse Not a “Spouse”?

Death Benefit

July 22, 2024: No Evidence Tendered to Rebut Concussion Diagnosis

MIG

July 17, 2024: 196K Grievance Award Factored into IRB Calculation

IRB

July 15, 2024: Chronic Pain Diagnosis Does Not Warrant MIG Escape

MIG

July 10, 2024: Court Allows Applicant to Submit Judicial Review After the Fact

Divisional Court

July 8, 2024: MIG Escape Despite Unrelated Psych Issues

MIG

July 3, 2024:Application Premature On Benefits Claimed in Excess of Limits

Award, CAT, Jurisdiction

June 26, 2024: Multiple Wilful Misrepresentations Claimed but Only One Established

IRB

June 24, 2024: Chronic Pain Diagnosis 4 Years Later Uncontroverted

MIG

June 19, 2024: Court Sets Aside Tribunal Decision and Makes Decision that Ought to Have Been Made

Definition Accident, Divisional Court

June 17, 2024: Cause of ‘Remote’ Finger Fracture Questioned

MIG

June 10, 2024: Reliability on IE Opinions Challenged

MIG

June 5, 2024: IE 'Highly Intrusive' - Not Acceptable Reason For Failure To Attend

Insurer's Examinations

June 3, 2024: MVA Necessary Cause of Subluxation of Shoulder Joint

MIG

May 29, 2024: Practicing Lawyer Seeks CAT Determination

CAT

May 27, 2024: Differing Opinions on Right Knee Injury Causation

MIG

May 22, 2024: Four Marked Impairments CAT and Post 104 IRB Confirmed

CAT, IRB

May 15, 2024: Court Confirms Three Breaches of Procedural Fairness by Tribunal

Div Court

May 13, 2024: Little Weight Given to Illegible Doctor's Notes

MIG

May 8, 2024: Reasonable Perception of Bias Involving Former Adjudicator Requires Rehearing

Reconsideration

May 6, 2024: Potential Causation Does Not Support MIG Escape

MIG

May 1, 2024: Tribunal Varies Three Decisions on Reconsideration

Reconsideration, Treatment Plans

April 29, 2024: Credibility of Assessment Favored Over Psych Validity Testing

MIG

April 24, 2024: Wilful Misrepresentation Abounds on IRB Repayments

IRB

April 22, 2024: Records Alone Do Not Warrant MIG Removal on Pre-Existing

MIG

April 15, 2024: Demands of Child-birth Pre-Existing Condition?

MIG

April 10, 2024: Court Upholds Tribunal Decision That a MIG Removal is a Complete MIG Removal

Divisional Court, MIG

April 8, 2024: Psychiatric Diagnosis Prevails over Psychological Opinion

MIG

April 3, 2024: Court Sends Matter Back to Tribunal Concerning “Accident”

Definition Accident, Divisional Court

April 1, 2024: Ortho Opinion Prevails on Origins of a Fracture

MIG

March 27, 2024: Supreme Court Takes Issue with Tribunal, Divisional Court & Court of Appeal

Limitation Period, Reconsideration, Supreme Court

March 25, 2024: Expert’s Conclusory Statement Insufficient on Pre-existing Condition

MIG

March 20, 2024: Non-Compliance by Both Parties Impacts IRB and Medical Claims

IRB

March 18, 2024: No Weight Afforded to Handwritten Illegible CNR’s

MIG

March 13, 2024: Denials Deficient and Pain Relief Validates Treatment Plans

Treatment Plans

March 11, 2024: “Radicular Irritation” & MRI Findings Not MVA Related

MIG

March 6, 2024: Tribunal Upholds Decision Excluding Improperly Secured IEs From the Evidence

Evidence, IE, Reconsideration

March 4, 2024: Concussion and Chronic Pain Diagnoses Require Expertise

MIG

February 28, 2024: Prior Health Concerns Complicate Claim for CAT

CAT

February 26, 2024: Unchallenged Virtual Chronic Pain Assessment Accepted

MIG

February 21, 2024: Consent by Parties for Adjournment Not Determinative

Adjournment, Procedure

February 14, 2024: Tribunal Does Not Accept the CAT Findings of Either Party

CAT

February 12, 2024: MIG Escape on Concussion Diagnosis Despite Resolution of Symptoms

MIG