Print
 

  MIG Update – November 18, 2024



No Evidence Pre-Existing Conditions Prevent MMR

This week, a MIG hold case where the Tribunal considered the Applicant’s claim of a pre-existing MCL tear and psychological injury once again affirming that MIG escapes on the basis of pre-exiting conditions is a high bar. ‘The test is whether the pre-existing condition would prevent maximal medical recovery and the applicant has not addressed that.”



Virtual Training – New – Upcoming Sessions!

Secure your seat for inHEALTH’s 2024 Fall Virtual Training session!

  • BI Fundamentals: January 20th – 24th, 2024
  • SABS Expedited: February 10th – 14th, 2024

*Eligible Participants receive 9 Substantive – CPD hours upon course completion

Course details & register here +



Factor: Pre-Existing Condition

In Singh v. Certas Direct Insurance (22-010050) Harjinder Singh was involved in a motor vehicle accident on April 17, 2020 and sought entitlement to two Treatment Plans for chiropractic services and psychological assessment. He claimed he should be removed from the MIG on the basis of pre-existing MCL tear to his left knee and psychological impairment and chronic pain as a result of the accident.

Singh relied on the CNRs of his family physician, Dr. Bunn in support of his claims of pre-existing psychological complaints. Further, he received physiotherapy prior to the subject accident for his left knee condition. He submitted that his ongoing pain resulted in an inability to return to his pre-accident activities of running, playing hockey, and going to the gym. He also argued that his injuries have had a significant impact on all facets of his normal life including physical, emotional and cognitive spheres. He relied on the OCF-3 of chiropractor Dr Jessa dated June 2021 which diagnosed him with “other chronic pain, and the February 2022 OCF-18s which indicated that he was psychologically impaired, noted sleep problems, thoughts of accident, problems with memory/concentration, and driving/passenger anxiety.

Certas argued that Singh failed to provide evidence that he had a pre-existing physical or psychological condition that would prevent him from achieving maximal medical recovery within the MIG, as there was no diagnostic imaging to substantiate that he suffered an MCL tear, and the diagnosis was not mentioned in any medical records. Dr. Bunn’s records did not mention psychological impairment and the only mention was found in the OCF 18 of Dr. Jessa, who was not qualified to make this diagnosis. Further, it argued that Singh did not meet the criteria for chronic pain by the AMA Guides, nor was he diagnosed with chronic pain by a qualified medical practitioner. They argued that Singh did not experience functional limitations, relying on the OCF-1 dated April 2020, which indicated that he did not miss any work, and the report of cardiologist Dr. Tjandrawidjaj dated February 2022, which indicated that he played hockey “regularly without difficulty”.




The Tribunal found:

    • “Aside from noting the existence of pre-existing conditions in his submissions, the applicant has not directed me to any evidence that either of these conditions would preclude him from achieving maximal medical recovery if he was kept within the MIG limits. While the applicant argues that these pre-existing conditions were exacerbated, this is not the test. The test is whether the pre-existing condition would prevent maximal medical recovery and the applicant has not addressed that.”
    • In review of Dr. Bunn’s records Singh saw his family doctor on two occasions on December 12, 2018 and January 8, 2019 with psychological complaints and there were no additional records documenting ongoing psychological complaints after that. This was insufficient evidence to show that these complaints would prevent recovery if held to the MIG.
    • There were no records to support a diagnosis of a MCL tear to his left knee prior to the subject accident. The ER records from Headwaters Health Care Centre dated March 2, 2020, notes “painful LT knee” and the x-ray found “no fracture, subluxation or dislocation. Alignment is anatomic. Soft tissues are unremarkable. No joint effusion”.
    • There were no records provided to confirm Singh received physiotherapy for the left knee condition prior to the accident from the treating physiotherapy clinic. The left knee MRI taken after the accident in July 2020 revealed “some chondromalacia on the femoral component”. However, Dr. Bunn makes no mention about a prognosis or any limitations based on the MRI results and makes no mention of the accident.This was insufficient evidence to show a finding of a pre-existing left knee condition that would prevent recovery if held to the MIG.
    • Although the OCF-3 by chiropractor Dr. Jess dated June 2021, indicated that Singh suffered from chronic pain, the CNR’s of the treatment clinic provided no evidence of functional impairments. In fact, in the report of cardiologist Dr. Tjandrawidjaj dated February 2022, Singh indicated that he played hockey “regularly without difficulty” and the OCF-1 dated April 2020 demonstrated that his accident-related injuries did not prevent him from working as a distribution manager.
    • The first mention of psychological complaints was almost two years after the accident, in a February 2022 OCF-18 by chiropractor Dr. Jessa, who is not qualified to diagnose or treat psychological conditions. Singh did not complain of psychological impairments to his family Dr. Bunn or any other health practitioner.


If you Have Read This Far…

Our MIG Monday series discusses the multitude of factors to consider when evaluating a risk position on MIG cases. The Tribunal has ruled on the MIG in 24% of the decisions so far. Each case is nuanced, but with similar factors.

Inform your position & present persuasive arguments. Include an Outcome Analysis Report (OAR) in your case evaluation complete with For/Against cases. Need an OAR?

 

Archive of LAT Updates

December 18, 2024: Applicant Successful in CAT Case Where Respondent’s Expert Unavailable

CAT

December 16, 2024: Applicants Lose on Flawed Interpretation of the Schedule

MIG

December 11, 2024: Court Sends Paraplegic Matter Back to Tribunal re “Accident”

Definition Accident, Divisional Court, Reconsiderations

December 9, 2024: Pre-Existing Conditions MIG Escapes?

MIG

December 4, 2024: Court Remits $770K Award Worthy Matter Back to Tribunal

Award, Divisional Court, IRB

December 2, 2024: GP Questionnaire Does Not Trigger MIG Escape on Pre Existing

MIG

November 27, 2024: Court Remits $200K Award Worthy Matters Back to Tribunal

Award, Divisional Court, IRB

November 25, 2024: Pre-Screen Not Psychological Diagnosis

MIG

November 20, 2024: IE Not Reasonable or Necessary – No to CAT & IRB

CAT, IRB, Procedure

November 18, 2024: No Evidence Pre-Existing Conditions Prevent MMR

MIG

November 13, 2024: Applicant’s Explanation for Delayed Application Found Reasonable

Procedure

November 11, 2024: GP Concussion Diagnosis Accepted as Legitimate

MIG

November 6, 2024: Court Remits “Unsafe” Decision Back for Rehearing

CAT

November 4, 2024: Submissions Do Not = Evidence

MIG

October 30, 2024: Court Remits “Unsafe” Decision Back for Rehearing

CAT, Divisional Court

October 28, 2024: IE Fails to Explain Lack of Diagnosis

MIG

October 23, 2024: Loose Lid Unexpected "Accident"

Definition Accident

October 21, 2024: Dental Work Required Not Caused by MVA

MIG

October 7, 2024: Continuity of Complaints Confirm Chronic Pain

MIG

October 2, 2024: All Items in Dispute Deemed Incurred

Treatment Plans

September 30, 2024: Ignoring Medical Evidence Proves Award Worthy

MIG

September 25, 2024: Credibility Issues Abound with IE Assessor

IE

September 23, 2024: Reliance on Symptom Magnification Test Proves Fatal

MIG

September 16, 2024: Self Reporting Accepted for Psych MIG Escape

MIG

September 9, 2024: Diagnosis Alone Falls Short in Chronic Pain Case

MIG

September 4, 2024: CAT Finding Upheld on Reconsideration

CAT, Reconsiderations

August 28, 2024: Staged MVA Results in $93K Repayment Order

Definition Accident, Evidence

August 26, 2024: What Exactly Constitutes “Compelling” Evidence?

MIG

August 21, 2024: Extreme Impairment Confirmed in CAT Decision

CAT

August 19, 2024: Post Concussive Syndrome Diagnosed in Telephone Interview

MIG

August 14, 2024: Reconsideration Varies Decision Regarding “Accident”

Definition Accident, Divisional Court

August 12, 2024: Adverse Inference Considered in MIG Determination

MIG

August 7, 2024: Re-Training Not A Viable Option - Post 104 IRB Confirmed

IRB

July 31, 2024: Applicants Allowed to Proceed to Hearing Despite Alleged Non – Compliance

Insurer’s Examinations, Procedure

July 29, 2024: No Specific Reference to Evidence Precludes MIG Escape

MIG

July 24, 2024: When is a Spouse Not a “Spouse”?

Death Benefit

July 22, 2024: No Evidence Tendered to Rebut Concussion Diagnosis

MIG

July 17, 2024: 196K Grievance Award Factored into IRB Calculation

IRB

July 15, 2024: Chronic Pain Diagnosis Does Not Warrant MIG Escape

MIG

July 10, 2024: Court Allows Applicant to Submit Judicial Review After the Fact

Divisional Court

July 8, 2024: MIG Escape Despite Unrelated Psych Issues

MIG

July 3, 2024:Application Premature On Benefits Claimed in Excess of Limits

Award, CAT, Jurisdiction

June 26, 2024: Multiple Wilful Misrepresentations Claimed but Only One Established

IRB

June 24, 2024: Chronic Pain Diagnosis 4 Years Later Uncontroverted

MIG

June 19, 2024: Court Sets Aside Tribunal Decision and Makes Decision that Ought to Have Been Made

Definition Accident, Divisional Court

June 17, 2024: Cause of ‘Remote’ Finger Fracture Questioned

MIG

June 10, 2024: Reliability on IE Opinions Challenged

MIG

June 5, 2024: IE 'Highly Intrusive' - Not Acceptable Reason For Failure To Attend

Insurer's Examinations

June 3, 2024: MVA Necessary Cause of Subluxation of Shoulder Joint

MIG

May 29, 2024: Practicing Lawyer Seeks CAT Determination

CAT

May 27, 2024: Differing Opinions on Right Knee Injury Causation

MIG

May 22, 2024: Four Marked Impairments CAT and Post 104 IRB Confirmed

CAT, IRB

May 15, 2024: Court Confirms Three Breaches of Procedural Fairness by Tribunal

Div Court

May 13, 2024: Little Weight Given to Illegible Doctor's Notes

MIG

May 8, 2024: Reasonable Perception of Bias Involving Former Adjudicator Requires Rehearing

Reconsideration

May 6, 2024: Potential Causation Does Not Support MIG Escape

MIG

May 1, 2024: Tribunal Varies Three Decisions on Reconsideration

Reconsideration, Treatment Plans

April 29, 2024: Credibility of Assessment Favored Over Psych Validity Testing

MIG

April 24, 2024: Wilful Misrepresentation Abounds on IRB Repayments

IRB

April 22, 2024: Records Alone Do Not Warrant MIG Removal on Pre-Existing

MIG

April 15, 2024: Demands of Child-birth Pre-Existing Condition?

MIG